Ha.. of course I won't agree to say that HK can't give rise to world-class scientists since it is small and limited in resources too...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to a few of your examples first. Those few distinct athletes are more individual type of heros who dedicate themselves, it is not uncommon even for us to say that it would have been a lot easier for many other potentially talented athletes to rise if we have more systematic type of training and opportnities provided..... In short, the way that we are expecting an indigenous HK great athlete is not how, China and US say, engineer their athletes.
Back to economy, our main rise in terms of commerce was due to HK's position relative to China in the past, but we are losing that type of advantage now. And people's quality in China is rapidly catching up. We do have advantage over things like the financial industry, but the problem is that not every HK guy is working in those fields.... the available opportunities are too limited in terms of what our education has actually enabled us, and what a modern economic entity would talk about. We do have world-class coverage and quality in education, but we don't have world-class economic structure (in terms of variety) to support it thereafter. That is why in HK, studying for a Ph.D. is close to meaning the end of your scientific career, while in the US it is the beginning of your career. Where are the opportunities afterwards?
Back to the wide acclaim of HK movie industry in the US, actually the westerners are only amazed at things like wuxia pian and kungfu, etc., they scarcely know anything beyond. And in terms of their curiosity toward Asia, Chinese and Korean movies are indeed gaining more attention now...
Back to football, the European ones have definitely suggest that one needs to break away from the boundary of nation to really rise....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I am talking about as "too small" is about the lack of a suitable "system" of doing things that can give rise to things a lot more naturally, even in an environment lack of individual heros. This is how the modern world functions, specifically, ORCHESTRATED COLLECTIVE EFFORTS which arise naturally. We have by far the strongest research capability in this age now, although you hear no Einstein!
Today science and technology is a good example, it is not uncommon for a particular problem to draw in efforts from very distinct fields of study. For example, control is an important branch of engineering with which the methodology is being used in every engineering branch. The tradition of control though, lies in things like military applications, space science, etc. This is not what science and technology can effectively do if we focus ourselves in just HK; we don't even have army, there is no market to do research on those stuffs, right? And that presents as one of our fundamental limitations.
So, the whole thing is not on the level of individual ability and so forth, rather it is the "system aspect" I am talking about. Something which I am a bit uneasy in HK is that when we try to distinguish ourselves from especially the mainland, we do it in a way of separation; are we strong enough to join their main current and yet be able to distinguish ourselves? This is what I see as a real challenge.
/Ha.. of course I won't agree to say that HK can't give rise to world-class scientists since it is small and limited in resources too.../
yeah, there are many great scientists and thinkers in hk, examples are mr. cheung hoi pan and mr wslee... ^^
/Back to a few of your examples first. Those few distinct athletes are more individual type of heros who dedicate themselves,/
may be cooperation of heroes is the main problem.
/ engineer their athletes./
nice term.
/they scarcely know anything beyond/
it is a process of education, a long way to go
/What I am talking about as "too small" is about the lack of a suitable "system" of doing things that can give rise to things a lot more naturally, even in an environment lack of individual heros. This is how the modern world functions, /
yea, but training system development is our strength
/ don't even have army, there is no market to do research on those stuffs,/
may be we should focus on the China market
/are we strong enough to join their main current and yet be able to distinguish ourselves? This is what I see as a real challenge./
one country two system will help to distinguish ourselves? ( just kidding)
actually i think system development is always our strength.
why can we develop a great political and legislative system for our society, but not the field of soccer?
離線
甚麼問題能迴避, 甚麼問題不能迴避, 沒有明確的guideline, 但可在具體問題上運用思考方法作具體分析, 這就是我們所說的 " 賦能進路 ".
佛學中有種講法, 叫"萬法唯心", 但甚麼是萬法唯心? 是說宇宙一切都是由心所造成? 還是好像唯心論者所說的宇宙只有心而沒有物? 如果是前者的話, "宇宙一切都是由心所造成" 這句話本身也是語意曖昧的 ; 如果是後者, 宇宙只有心而沒有物更是與我們所認知的世界有衝突.
誠邀各路網友英雄參與討論.
期待吳先生的文章.
佛學中的"萬法唯心"在我看來是唯心論的觀點，類似巴克萊的“存在就是被感知”的説法。
請各位網友指正。
希望能多讀到吳先生有關佛學方面的文章。
謝謝！
大家叫我 Daniel 仔可也.
請各位網友指正。
但問題是, 甚麼叫作萬法唯心?
如果如巴克萊等唯心論的觀點, 是否是在說宇宙只有心而沒有物呢? 如果是的話, 則與我們日常所認知的世界好像有點衝突.
我不熟悉唯心論, 萬望張海澎先生及冷眼先生等高人指正.
謝謝！
小弟對佛學方面認知只屬皮毛, 請先生多發表在佛學方面的心得以裨益各網友後學才對.
支持支持！ ＾＾
諺語說文無第一, 武無第二.
但為何文無第一? 因為從前無現在的徵文比賽. 現在的徵文比賽中, 文是有第一的. ^^
為何武無第二? 因為從前比武不決生死不算英雄? 文明的武術比賽, 即如泰拳般剛猛的比賽, 也可分第一第二名吧.
故此, 諺語所謂文無第一, 武無第二, 恐怕在現代生活中變得有點過時了.
^^
well done. great job!
有些人把工作視為迫於無奈的事情, 有些大有錢人卻樂於不停做善事, 為什麼會有如此兩種南轅北轍的人在世界?
我認為是這兩種人有著兩種迥然不同的思想而造成.
前者, 把世間看成監獄, 把生活看成被迫而生, 故終日發牢騷怨天怨地怨父母, 但為何他們不去死呢? 因為無膽.
後者, 把花花世界看成樂園, 即使在工作環境中有苦要受, 他們會把工作環境轉變成少林寺, 風境不轉心境轉. 這樣的一種生命形態, 縱窮苦亦樂. 試問若在少林寺修行, 哪個人不從低等弟子起步? 哪個入門弟子不用經過挑水打掃的階段? 這亦是修行, 入門的修行, 一步步進升便是遊戲了, 只有有這樣的思想及心態的人才可在這個社會從低 "玩" 起, 一步步修行至方丈階層, 再而教育後進, 更而下山鋤強扶弱, 發揚少林, 如大有錢人卻樂於不停做善事, 把德行永存於天, 真正擺脫物慾的束縛.
[試問若在少林寺修行, 哪個人不從低等弟子起步? 哪個入門弟子不用經過挑水打掃的階段? 這亦是修行, 入門的修行, 一步步進升便是遊戲了. ]
但有些人在這個世界卻抱有不同的思想, 他們不把工作過程視作修行, 不明白付出越多, 自己修為越強的道理, 故此, 這些人遇到挫折便很容易放棄. 這些人, 註定在少林寺一生一無所成, 老來也只能作打掃洗碗而不能達到有修為的方丈境界, 在社會一生勞勞碌碌卻一無所進.
劉德華: 常言道
作曲：藍奕邦 填詞：林夕
在少林寺一生一無所成, 在社會一生勞勞碌碌卻一無所進, 這就是人所說的:
.
.
如入寶山空手回.
有些人, 把自我局限於自身, 不顧他人的死活, 只追求個人的快樂, 這些人是孔子所說的 --- 小人
有些人, 把自我擴大至國家民族, 全世界甚至全宇宙, 這些是中國文化中所稱的 --- 大人.
小人看見別人快樂, 他們不會快樂, 因為別人不是自己.
大人看見別人快樂, 他們一樣快樂, 因為別人是大我一部份.
未有靈感, 是日休息.
有人說香港足球已死，無希望，但香港足球曾有輝煌的歷史，曾於亞洲盃奪得第三名，1974年世界盃決賽週外圍賽曾擊敗馬來西亞、越南和日本，只是最終以1比3不敵東道主韓國而屈居第二以致未能出線，1986年亦晉身外圍賽第二圈，只最後敗給日本未能出線. 香港雖是彈丸之地，地少人多，但早期香港在其他亞洲國家譽為「足球王國」，可想而知當時的香港足球是何等風光
( 維基百科資料)http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E8%B6%B3%E7%90%83%E4%BB%A3%E8%A1%A8%E9%9A%8A
但為何香港足球會淪落至如斯地步? 是人少的問題，還是足球文化 / 培訓機制的問題?
不如加入中國聯賽吧。
對現代世界發展的規模而言，香港太小了..
香港足運的光輝歲月都已成過去.現在需要另一種世界觀!
做每一件事都要百分百的專注,港人除了賺錢外,我們有那份專注和投入嗎??
/港人除了賺錢外,我們有那份專注和投入嗎??/
這就是我認為的禍根所在!
/不如加入中國聯賽吧。/
其中一個提升方法, 但也可保留本地聯賽, 保留世界杯參賽資格, 香港是一個神奇的地方, 地方雖小, 五臟俱全, 神人奇人俯拾皆是. (香港影藝奇蹟就是一例, 人人都打天才波! )
不妄自菲薄, 香港足球其實可拾回昔日光輝.
<<港人無哂夢想
/港人除了賺錢外,我們有那份專注和投入嗎??/
這就是我認為的禍根所在!>>
進一步，說港人只顧賺，是不是說香港所提供的只是賺錢的機會，而沒有其他機會呢？
也不盡如此, 只是近二十年香港人的價值觀扭曲了, 沒有了 80 代初哪份白手興家, 從零出發的, 一步一步慢慢實現夢想的冀盼, 變得急功近利, 終日只發著一朝暴富的痴夢.
如果說人少是香港足球衰落的原因, 哪應從何解釋地小人少的香港這百年間從無到有, 以至成為雄視全球的國際經濟大都會呢?
有人說, 香港地細人少, 足球不可能達至世界一流水平
曾有人說, 香港地細人少, 運動不可能達至世界一流水平, 結果我們出了李麗姍 , 黃金寶
曾有人說, 香港地細人少, 經濟不可能達至世界一流水平, 結果我們集資額超越 dow jones
曾有人說, 香港地細人少, 影片不可能達至世界一流水平, 結果 <功夫之王> 得到全美開畫票房冠軍.
現在和可見將來, 仍會有人說:
" 香港地細人少, 足球不可能達至世界一流水平 " ....
Ha.. of course I won't agree to say that HK can't give rise to world-class scientists since it is small and limited in resources too...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back to a few of your examples first. Those few distinct athletes are more individual type of heros who dedicate themselves, it is not uncommon even for us to say that it would have been a lot easier for many other potentially talented athletes to rise if we have more systematic type of training and opportnities provided..... In short, the way that we are expecting an indigenous HK great athlete is not how, China and US say, engineer their athletes.
Back to economy, our main rise in terms of commerce was due to HK's position relative to China in the past, but we are losing that type of advantage now. And people's quality in China is rapidly catching up. We do have advantage over things like the financial industry, but the problem is that not every HK guy is working in those fields.... the available opportunities are too limited in terms of what our education has actually enabled us, and what a modern economic entity would talk about. We do have world-class coverage and quality in education, but we don't have world-class economic structure (in terms of variety) to support it thereafter. That is why in HK, studying for a Ph.D. is close to meaning the end of your scientific career, while in the US it is the beginning of your career. Where are the opportunities afterwards?
Back to the wide acclaim of HK movie industry in the US, actually the westerners are only amazed at things like wuxia pian and kungfu, etc., they scarcely know anything beyond. And in terms of their curiosity toward Asia, Chinese and Korean movies are indeed gaining more attention now...
Back to football, the European ones have definitely suggest that one needs to break away from the boundary of nation to really rise....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
What I am talking about as "too small" is about the lack of a suitable "system" of doing things that can give rise to things a lot more naturally, even in an environment lack of individual heros. This is how the modern world functions, specifically, ORCHESTRATED COLLECTIVE EFFORTS which arise naturally. We have by far the strongest research capability in this age now, although you hear no Einstein!
Today science and technology is a good example, it is not uncommon for a particular problem to draw in efforts from very distinct fields of study. For example, control is an important branch of engineering with which the methodology is being used in every engineering branch. The tradition of control though, lies in things like military applications, space science, etc. This is not what science and technology can effectively do if we focus ourselves in just HK; we don't even have army, there is no market to do research on those stuffs, right? And that presents as one of our fundamental limitations.
So, the whole thing is not on the level of individual ability and so forth, rather it is the "system aspect" I am talking about. Something which I am a bit uneasy in HK is that when we try to distinguish ourselves from especially the mainland, we do it in a way of separation; are we strong enough to join their main current and yet be able to distinguish ourselves? This is what I see as a real challenge.
ha.. a long one.. sorry for that..^^
/ha.. a long one.. sorry for that..^^/
academic research????
^+++++++++++^
/Ha.. of course I won't agree to say that HK can't give rise to world-class scientists since it is small and limited in resources too.../
yeah, there are many great scientists and thinkers in hk, examples are mr. cheung hoi pan and mr wslee... ^^
/Back to a few of your examples first. Those few distinct athletes are more individual type of heros who dedicate themselves,/
may be cooperation of heroes is the main problem.
/ engineer their athletes./
nice term.
/they scarcely know anything beyond/
it is a process of education, a long way to go
/What I am talking about as "too small" is about the lack of a suitable "system" of doing things that can give rise to things a lot more naturally, even in an environment lack of individual heros. This is how the modern world functions, /
yea, but training system development is our strength
/ don't even have army, there is no market to do research on those stuffs,/
may be we should focus on the China market
/are we strong enough to join their main current and yet be able to distinguish ourselves? This is what I see as a real challenge./
one country two system will help to distinguish ourselves? ( just kidding)
actually i think system development is always our strength.
why can we develop a great political and legislative system for our society, but not the field of soccer?
近二十年香港人的價值觀扭曲了, 沒有了 80 代初哪份白手興家, 從零出發的, 一步一步慢慢實現夢想的冀盼, 變得急功近利, 終日只發著一朝暴富的痴夢.
我在安置區 ( 木屋 / 鐵皮屋 ) 長大, 小時候沒有太多物質資源, 但人人有的都是阿信式的克苦奮鬥, 一往無前的精神及恆久堅忍的毅力, 即使買股票也多會買匯豐, 長揸廿年, 不會好像現在的人般短炒投機, 他們也許誤會了, 李嘉誠並非藉地產一朝暴富, 而是藉高超的金融財經智慧, 一步步實現他那全球企業王國的.
如果說人少是香港足球衰落的原因, 哪應從何解釋地小人少的香港這百年間從無到有, 以至成為雄視全球的國際經濟大都會呢?
香港曾是英國的殖民地, 強於法制及系統建立, 為何不可像英國般搞好陪訓制度足球系統? 搞好陪訓制度足球系統容易, 改變人的扭曲了近廿年的急功近利, 以體育運動為經濟服務變形價值觀才是困難.
馬勒當拿不會想如何以足球生命為自己致富, 而是以足球為生命, 他有的只是對足球的熱愛, 非常單純但可敬, 他觸及對足球的真愛的神聖之處, 金錢物慾滿足的快樂與這種" 觸及對足球的真愛的神聖之處" 的快樂根本不可比擬.
請吳彥祖君多寫. ^^
Justin Ng
發表新回應